locales dependency [was Re: bash migrating to testing]

2003-11-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Andreas Metzler writes: > BTW, does anybody know why glibc's dependencies are that strict, i.e. > why locales depends on the exact same version of libc6? I am sure that > compability breaks at some point but I wonder if e.g. locales 2.3.2.ds1-10 > would not run fine with libc6 2.3.2.ds1-9. see #20

Re: bash migrating to testing

2003-11-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:05:02AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:29:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > update-excuses lists for bash: > > > > # bash (2.05b-2-8.1 to 2.05b-2-11) > > > > * Maintainer: Matthias Klose > > * 22 days old (needed 5 days) > > * Va

Re: bash migrating to testing

2003-11-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:29:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > update-excuses lists for bash: > > # bash (2.05b-2-8.1 to 2.05b-2-11) > > * Maintainer: Matthias Klose > * 22 days old (needed 5 days) > * Valid candidate > > but it's not migrated to testing. hints needed? update_ou

bash migrating to testing

2003-11-07 Thread Matthias Klose
update-excuses lists for bash: # bash (2.05b-2-8.1 to 2.05b-2-11) * Maintainer: Matthias Klose * 22 days old (needed 5 days) * Valid candidate but it's not migrated to testing. hints needed?