Hi,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 18:38:38)
> Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28):
> > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49)
> > > > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > > > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > > > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/l
Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28):
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49)
> > > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols 2013-03-01
> > > 10:51:21.0 +
Hi,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49)
> > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols 2013-03-01
> > 10:51:21.0 +
> > +++ apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debia
I personally don't think it's a good idea to get such patches into
stable. Anyway if someone wants to proceed anyway, here are a few
things I spotted:
Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28):
> apt (0.9.7.9+deb7u2) wheezy-security; urgency=high
>
>* SECURITY UPDATE: apt-get source validation (closes
Hi,
Quoting Philipp Kern (2014-07-25 14:45:17)
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:19:38PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Maybe. We'd be equally (if not more) happy if SRM would reconsider their
> > decision (expressed on #debian-release toward Helmut Grohne) that these
> > patches
> > are too intru
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:19:38PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Philipp Kern (2014-07-24 00:25:41)
> > so I think this would rather be a question for stable, than for backports?
> Maybe. We'd be equally (if not more) happy if SRM would reconsider their
> decision (expressed on #debian-r
Hi,
Quoting Philipp Kern (2014-07-24 00:25:41)
> so I think this would rather be a question for stable, than for backports?
Maybe. We'd be equally (if not more) happy if SRM would reconsider their
decision (expressed on #debian-release toward Helmut Grohne) that these patches
are too intrusive fo
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 11:16:17PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Please reconsider adding packages with the attached three minimal patches for
> dpkg, apt and python-apt to backports. In contrast to a full backport these
> patches add the ability to parse the new build profile syntax with m
8 matches
Mail list logo
