Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-21 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/20/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: New version reviewed and hinted. Luk, can you drop your hint for the old version? Thanks, Steve. Cheers, Shaun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:31:03PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > swt-gtk 3.2.1-3 was buggy on amd64 (bug #403057). This bug is fixed in > swt-gtk 3.2.1-4. Can swt-gtk 3.2.1-4 be unblocked? Sorry for the > trouble. > Unblock request by luk ignored due to version mismatch: 3.2.1-3 > Not

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-19 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/11/06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Shaun Jackman wrote: >> >> > * swt-gtk (testing: 3.2.1-2, unstable: 3.2.1-3) >> >> > This update, which adds support for 64-bit architectures, is an >> >> > important one for etch. It is `out of date on sparc', which >> apparently >> >> > has a Ja

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/11/06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The build has been retried on the buildd (and succeeded). Good stuff. Ok, unblocked. Great, thanks! Cheers, Shaun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Luk Claes
Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 12/11/06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Shaun Jackman wrote: >> > On 12/11/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> > * swt-gtk (testing: 3.2.1-2, unstable: 3.2.1-3) >> >> > This update, which adds support for 64-bit architectures, is an >>

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/11/06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 12/11/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > * swt-gtk (testing: 3.2.1-2, unstable: 3.2.1-3) >> > This update, which adds support for 64-bit architectures, is an >> > important one for etch. It is `ou

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Luk Claes
Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 12/11/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > * swt-gtk (testing: 3.2.1-2, unstable: 3.2.1-3) >> > This update, which adds support for 64-bit architectures, is an >> > important one for etch. It is `out of date on sparc', which apparently >> > has a Jav

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/11/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison avarice avarice | 2.5-1 | testing | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc avarice | 2.5-1 | unstable | source, alpha, amd64, arm,

Re: avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * avarice (testing: 2.4-3, unstable: 2.5-1) > This package programs Atmel AVR microcontrollers. Its usefulness > depends on its support for recent microcontrollers. The new upstream > version adds support for the microcontrollers AT90USB1287 and > ATmeg

avarice, monotone, swt-gtk

2006-12-11 Thread Shaun Jackman
I have three packages out of date between testing and unstable: * avarice (testing: 2.4-3, unstable: 2.5-1) This package programs Atmel AVR microcontrollers. Its usefulness depends on its support for recent microcontrollers. The new upstream version adds support for the microcontrollers AT90USB12