Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> On 17-12-2007 18:35, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 11236 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
transitions every so of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-12-2007 18:35, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11236 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>>> So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
>>> transitions every so o
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Enrico Zini wrote:
>>
>> If that isn't too much burden, I can patch dput to download the file,
>> check if one of the build-deps in the .dsc shows up on a record an take
>> the appropriate action.
>
> Why dput? dput can also be used fo
Hi Enrico,
Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> If that isn't too much burden, I can patch dput to download the file,
> check if one of the build-deps in the .dsc shows up on a record an take
> the appropriate action.
Why dput? dput can also be used for local and non-Debian repositories so I'd
rather make the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > This kind of scenario made me think... would it make sense to publish in
> > a fixed location a machine-readable scenario of current ongoing
> > transitions,
> Yes, I've very often thought there is a real need for this, but I
> hav
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11236 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>>> So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
>>> transitions every so often, I would like to have some sort of handy
On 11236 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>> So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
>> transitions every so often, I would like to have some sort of handy way
>> to know "you're free to upload to sid" o
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
> transitions every so often, I would like to have some sort of handy way
> to know "you're free to upload to sid" or "hang on a sec, or upload to
> experimental".
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
> So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
> transitions every so often, I would like to have some sort of handy way
> to know "you're free to upload to sid" or "hang on a sec, or upload to
> experimental". A way that pos
[ I've droped people that are know to be subscribed on ml ]
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (this is an expansion of a reply I dashed off earlier to Otavio on my
>way to dinner)
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:42:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to sa
* Enrico Zini [Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:48:48 +0100]:
> I would like to have some sort of handy way
> to know "you're free to upload to sid" or "hang on a sec, or upload to
> experimental". A way that possibly doesn't require following both
> deity@ and debian-release@ regularly.
* Enrico Zini [Mon,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 08:32:31PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I wonder if it would be a good idea to announce apt transitions on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] aptitude is not special in its dependency structure; any
> upload of an apt-related package will do the same thing, and I think
> maintainers
(this is an expansion of a reply I dashed off earlier to Otavio on my
way to dinner)
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:42:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I'd like to ask you to postpone any other aptitude upload, for sid,
> until we're moved current APT to testin
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:02:09AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:51:35AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Unfortunately is not going to happen as soon as we wanted due to a new
> > aptitude upload...
> This kind of scenario made me think... would it make sense to publish in
>
Dear Daniel,
I'd like to ask you to postpone any other aptitude upload, for sid,
until we're moved current APT to testing since we do want to move
forward with APT on sid but d-i and other things need this (0.7.9)
version to be available ASAP.
Cheers,
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ot
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:51:35AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Unfortunately is not going to happen as soon as we wanted due to a new
> aptitude upload...
This kind of scenario made me think... would it make sense to publish in
a fixed location a machine-readable scenario of current ongoing
transit
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It's already bumped with urgency (2 days) by Steve ...
>
> After APT moves to testing, we'll break ABI of it again on sid :(
> We've pending things fixed for uploading and some other Ubuntu changes
> for merging too.
Unfortunate
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's already bumped with urgency (2 days) by Steve ...
After APT moves to testing, we'll break ABI of it again on sid :(
We've pending things fixed for uploading and some other Ubuntu changes
for merging too.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> apt looks almost ready to transition with all that's related to it.
>
> Current blockers are (AFAICT):
> - python-apt: 9 of 10 days old
> - synaptic: 9 of 10 days old
> - libept: 1 of 10 days old + missing on 4 arches
>
> libept was uploaded yesterday with a minor (shl
Hi,
apt looks almost ready to transition with all that's related to it.
Current blockers are (AFAICT):
- python-apt: 9 of 10 days old
- synaptic: 9 of 10 days old
- libept: 1 of 10 days old + missing on 4 arches
libept was uploaded yesterday with a minor (shlib deps) change to fix a bug
in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
