Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-09-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 23:02:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I've fixed and uploaded a new version (0.9.9squeeze2). Please review and > apply > the exception. > Unblocked, thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-09-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Thanks Adam. On Friday 03 Sep 2010 20:31:19 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 18:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > apt-offline has still not migrated to Squeeze (13 days). > > Is there any action required at my end ? > > It's generally helpful if you let us know once the upload

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-09-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 18:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > apt-offline has still not migrated to Squeeze (13 days). > Is there any action required at my end ? It's generally helpful if you let us know once the upload has been accepted into the archive, so that we don't miss it. Looking at the

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-09-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Mehdi/Release Team, apt-offline has still not migrated to Squeeze (13 days). Is there any action required at my end ? Ritesh On Friday 20 Aug 2010 17:35:01 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/20/2010 02:00 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:49:33 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >>>

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/20/2010 02:00 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:49:33 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >>> offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the >>> --bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found), >>> `less` invocation does not come into picture. >> >>

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:49:33 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the > > --bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found), > > `less` invocation does not come into picture. > > Yes, I guess that. I'd prefer a Depends tbh. Okay!

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/20/2010 01:18 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Mehdi, > > On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:31:11 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >>> + * Add less to Recommends because we depend on `less` to display the >>> +bug reports >> >> Why recommend it if you "depend" on it? > > offline bug reports is one of th

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:48:04 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the > --bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found), `less` > invocation does not come into picture. And adding support for `more` will be more appropriate as

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Mehdi, On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:31:11 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > + * Add less to Recommends because we depend on `less` to display the > > +bug reports > > Why recommend it if you "depend" on it? offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the --bug-reports option was

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 0, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > +apt-offline (0.9.9squeeze1) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * Add less to Recommends because we depend on `less` to display the > +bug reports Why recommend it if you "depend" on it? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-re

apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Release Team, Will it be okay to commit the attached patch and do an upload to unstable ? This patch fixes a bug in apt-offline, DBTS #588908 This patch fixes a bug in apt-offline where in if the user passed in a path (a directory) that contains sub-directories, apt-offline fails. The fix