On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:40:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Takuo doesn't want the "gal" source package to refer to the
> out-of-date libraries. So I've just uploaded gal0.x, which provides
> the existing libgal-dev, libgal23, and libgal-data packages. I've
> also notified the other pe
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm confused; libgal2.4{,-dev} are in unstable now, and don't conflict with
> libgal{,-dev}, needed by gnucash, gpredict etc. Hence there doesn't seem
> to be any particular need to remove the old version.
No. We've sorted it out. All that is happeni
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:16:08PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Takuo Kitame has told me that the "gal" package will suddenly become
> the 2.x version of gal, instead of the 0.x version which it has always
> been until now. This seems to me to be a needless churning of package
> names and f
Takuo Kitame has told me that the "gal" package will suddenly become
the 2.x version of gal, instead of the 0.x version which it has always
been until now. This seems to me to be a needless churning of package
names and filenames.
It also causes me pain; gnucash needs the Gnome 1 gal. I'm happy
4 matches
Mail list logo
