On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:46:42PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:13 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were
> > > suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 wi
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:38:39 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 22:48:51 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
>
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3
> > >
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:13 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were
> > suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and
> > then leaving it in unstable an
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were
> suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and
> then leaving it in unstable and 0.29.3 in squeeze then yes, that would
> be fine.
Please give a qu
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > how about
> > > > something lik
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > how about
> > > something like:
> > You mean leave 0.29.5 in the archive as is, but with shlibs as 0
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The package descriptions of libneon27{,-gnutls} say "WARNING: THE NEON
> > API IS NOT YET STABLE" so removing the versioning entirely might not be
> > a good idea; on th
Hi Adam,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The package descriptions of libneon27{,-gnutls} say "WARNING: THE NEON
> API IS NOT YET STABLE" so removing the versioning entirely might not be
> a good idea; on the basis that there don't appear to have been any
> obvious API c
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 10:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:48 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> [ about neon27 packages ]
[...]
> There are changes for win32 and Solaris; the changelog says:
> Fix possi
Hi Adam,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:48 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
[ about neon27 packages ]
> It doesn't *just* contain the fixes which were previously backported
> though, there are code changes included which were not present in
> 0
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:48 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3
> > and neon27 to unstable. Were either of these uploads targetted at
> > Squeeze?
>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 22:48:51 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3
> > and neon27 to unstable. Were either of these uploads targetted at
> > Squeez
Hi Adam,
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3
> and neon27 to unstable. Were either of these uploads targetted at
> Squeeze?
Yes, both. The easiest is neon27, which is a clean upload of the
previous o
Hi Laszlo,
I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3
and neon27 to unstable. Were either of these uploads targetted at
Squeeze? If not then during a deepening freeze is a rather unfortunate
time to be making uploads of library packages, particularly those with a
nu
14 matches
Mail list logo
