On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 21:17, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi [Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:35:17 +0200]:
>
>> Well, I got a package in NEW (libpkg-guide) and I'd like to see it
>> shipped in Lenny, but it was more a general question about Release
>> Methods.
>
> Hm, I'm afraid it
* Sandro Tosi [Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:35:17 +0200]:
> Well, I got a package in NEW (libpkg-guide) and I'd like to see it
> shipped in Lenny, but it was more a general question about Release
> Methods.
Hm, I'm afraid it won't make it. (And that guide needs throughout
review, if not a rewrite.)
Cheer
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:20, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:47:00 +0200]:
>> Thanks for clarifying this! I would have asked sooner or later if you
>> hadn't said explicitly. Do you think worth write some sort of FAQ
>> about these things, a document
* Sandro Tosi [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:47:00 +0200]:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:13, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Packages that are present in unstable the day we freeze will be
> > | automatically allowed into testing, that is, the freeze date (next
> > | weekend) does not mean
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:13, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Packages that are present in unstable the day we freeze will be
> | automatically allowed into testing, that is, the freeze date (next
> | weekend) does not mean your package should be in testing by then,
> | but o
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:13:50AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> there was one bit about the handling of the freeze that was not well
> communicated in the previous release announcement:
>
> | Packages that are present in unstable the day we freeze will be
> | automatically allowed into tes
6 matches
Mail list logo
