On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 22:34:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 23:41:00 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > A few weeks ago I asked on #-release about the possibility of updating all
> > evolution components to their 3.4.4 releases.
> >
> > It's very rare that
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 10:34:51PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 23:41:00 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > A few weeks ago I asked on #-release about the possibility of updating all
> > evolution components to their 3.4.4 releases.
> >
> > It's very rare tha
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 23:41:00 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few weeks ago I asked on #-release about the possibility of updating all
> evolution components to their 3.4.4 releases.
>
> It's very rare that GNOME releases .4 tarballs for their cycles, but it
> seems the evolution main
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 23:41:00 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> If I'm given a green light, I'll upload e-d-s and gtkhtml tomorrow, and
> the other few bits a bit later.
>
I think you should go ahead and upload, at least to get this some
exposure in sid.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description
Hi,
A few weeks ago I asked on #-release about the possibility of updating all
evolution components to their 3.4.4 releases.
It's very rare that GNOME releases .4 tarballs for their cycles, but it
seems the evolution maintainer saw it fit, as there were quite a few
important bugfixes accumulating
5 matches
Mail list logo