I'm intending to release Linux 3.2.19 later today. The complete release
(files uploaded) depends on Greg K-H and probably won't be done until
later in the week, but we don't use pristine tarballs so this doesn't
hold up a Debian upload. It will include the usual mixture of security
fixes, other i
Ben Hutchings (19/05/2012):
> I intend to release Linux 3.2.18 on Sunday, and then upload linux-2.6
> version 3.2.18-1 to unstable. The upstream changes include quite a few
> stability and security fixes, but this update will be much smaller than
> 3.2.17. Debian changes include some new hardwar
I intend to release Linux 3.2.18 on Sunday, and then upload linux-2.6
version 3.2.18-1 to unstable. The upstream changes include quite a few
stability and security fixes, but this update will be much smaller than
3.2.17. Debian changes include some new hardware support. No ABI
change should be n
I intend to release Linux 3.2.17 on Saturday and then upload linux-2.6
version 3.2.17-1 to unstable. This includes a large number of bug
fixes. No ABI change should be necessary.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable this weekend. This includes
various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.16, a few more
bug fixes, and the addition of 'EFI stub' support on x86 (cherry-picked
from 3.3). There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I haven't lost my m
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:11:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
> > > that that happens before
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:11:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
> > that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1?
> >
> Set to 8 days instead of 10.
>
An
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
> that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1?
>
Set to 8 days instead of 10.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.15-1 during this weekend. This
includes various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.15,
and may have urgency=high (to be decided). There should not be any ABI
bump.
Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
that tha
Another week, another kernel version. More important security and other
fixes from upstream, and a fix for the FTBFS on s390(x).
I don't believe any ABI bump is required.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.
signature.asc
Description: This
There will be an upload of linux-2.6 version 3.2.10-1 to unstable
shortly. This will include upstream stable release 3.2.10 which fixes
a local DoS bug, CVE-2012-1097, and will therefore have high urgency.
It should also fix some serious regressions in the realtime featureset.
It doesn't look lik
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 20:22 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Ben,
>
> am Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:42:28PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version
> > 3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix
> > various
Ben,
am Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:42:28PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version
> 3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix
> various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on
> so
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version
3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix
various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on
some architectures in 3.2.7-1.
There will be an ABI bump.
The link security restrictio
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.6-1 to unstable tomorrow. This
includes a large number of fixes from upstream stable release 3.2.6. It
also adds a realtime configuration for i386 (rt-686-pae).
There is no ABI change.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers.
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 01:55 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
> > week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
> > upstream stable update.
>
> I wonder which kernel is t
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
> week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
> upstream stable update.
I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to
http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
The packaging and configuration changes include:
- [amd64] reenable rt featureset (not available for Linux 3.1)
- Use xz compression
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable later this week, once upstream
stable update 3.1.8 is released.
Linux 3.2 is also likely to be released very soon, but I think we still
have some work to do on updating the configuration for it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Make three consecutive correct guesse
Ben Hutchings writes:
> I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.5-1 to unstable this weekend.
> This is another upstream stable update. It also includes a fix for the
> FTBFS on mips/mipsel in 3.1.4-1.
>
> No ABI bump seems to be necessary.
>
> Ben.
Shouldn't that be linux-3 or just plain linu
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.5-1 to unstable this weekend.
This is another upstream stable update. It also includes a fix for the
FTBFS on mips/mipsel in 3.1.4-1.
No ABI bump seems to be necessary.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend.
This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid
(powerpc) and experimental (armel, powerpc). It will be built with
gcc-4.6, the default compiler version for wheezy.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The program is absolu
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-6 to unstable today
(Tuesday). This will include stable updates 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 and may
require an ABI change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the
missing kernel-image udebs in 3.0.0-5, among other things.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow.
This will include upstream stable update 3.0.4 and various other bug
fixes. It should not involve an ABI bump.
Let me know if there is anything this should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Power corrupts. Absolute power is kin
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-3 to unstable on Friday or
Saturday.
This will include the fixes from stable release 3.0.3 and should fix the
FTBFS on mips & mipsel.
There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-2 to unstable on Monday or
Tuesday.
This will include the fixes from stable releases 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 and
rt release 3.0.1-rt8 (or later). Also, linux-libc-dev will support
multi-arch.
There should be no ABI bump. However, note that the ABI for packages
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow.
Aside from upstream changes, the main changes are:
* [x86] block, xen: Enable XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND as module
- This means x86 kernels (except for the 486 flavour) are now
suitable for running in Xen dom0
* Make gcc-4.5
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.39-3 to unstable on Monday.
This will include stable update 2.6.39.2. It doesn't appear to require
an ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 09:44:44 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 06:01 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will
> > include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use
> > in Debian Live.
> >
> > Stable update 2.6
On 06/05/2011 06:01 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will
> include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use
> in Debian Live.
>
> Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have
> to change the
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will
include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use
in Debian Live.
Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have
to change the binary package names.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a jo
I intend to upload linux-2.6 verson 2.6.38-5 tomorrow. This will
incorporate 2.6.38.5, which fixes numerous bugs including local
privilege escalation bugs in the agp driver (CVE-2011-1745,
CVE-2011-1746).
Let me know if there's anything I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fo
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4 to unstable this week,
including the upstream stable release 2.6.38.4.
There should be no ABI bump (contrary to my previous message on -kernel).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We
> now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending
> stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours'
> time if there are no obj
Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We
now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending
stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours'
time if there are no objections.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anyth
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-2 early next week,
incorporating upstream stable releases 2.6.38.1 and .2.
This will bump the ABI number to 2 (so I will also upload
linux-latest-2.6). It will fix the FTBFS on mips, and if nothing else
is broken then it should be able to progress into
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-1 to unstable shortly after
the upstream release, along with corresponding versions of
linux-kbuild-2.6 and linux-latest-2.6. This should then progress into
testing.
The kernel team is discussing removal of the i386/686 flavour and
renaming one or both
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
...
> That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release
> 2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes.
It would be nice if it can be done before since I'll do a surgery on
26th and need to travel for it on 24th or 25th.
--
Ot
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > I know that I need to upload in time
* Adam D. Barratt [2011-03-01 19:17]:
> Otavio: other than lkdi and the d-i build itself (which I guess could be
> a binNMU this time?)
It cannot be a binNMU since there are at least two changes in
debian-installer for squeeze.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > ...
> > > I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
> > > the installer with the new k
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
>> assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
>> cuple of weeks like a good time
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> ...
> > I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
> > the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
> > with the kernel use
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings wrote:
...
> I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
> the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
> with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the
> deadline is for that?
Dann is currently occupied by family matters, so I am preparing to
handle this stable update.
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know w
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.37-2 later this week, incorporating
upstream stable release 2.6.37.2.
This will include an ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Alb
On 02/08/2011 04:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> AUFS will be included for use in Debian Live if there is a version
> compatible with 2.6.37.
is available, see upstreams repository at
http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/gitweb?p=aufs/aufs2-2.6.git
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
> > will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
> > (Linux containers, using
On mer., 2011-02-09 at 17:47 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
> > > will not come back. OpenVZ and
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
> will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
> (Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen
> support in mainline Linux is i
I intend to upload linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 based on upstream
version 2.6.37, later this week. linux-latest-2.6 will also be
updated.
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
(Linux containers, u
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-30 on Monday or Tuesday.
This will include many bug fixes from longterm release 2.6.32.28 and
elsewhere.
There is no ABI bump. One of the bug fixes changes the ABI of the
Socket Control Message interface used to support passing file
descriptors through
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-29 once stable release
2.6.32.27 is out, probably Thursday or Friday. This includes a large
number of security fixes, so I intend to set urgency=high.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signatu
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 16:57:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night
> or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has
> a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'.
>
Unblocked.
Chee
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night
or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has
a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'.
Let me know if there's anything that I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We ge
Forwarded Message
From: Ben Hutchings
To: Debian kernel maintainers
Cc: debian-relea...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Uploading linux-2.6
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:49:21 +0100
As soon as 2.6.32-20 is in testing, I intend to upload 2.6.32-21 with
priority 'high'. This in
linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-18 should transition to testing in 2 days.
Following that, I intend to upload 2.6.32-19 incorporating stable
release 2.6.32.17 and DRM changes from stable release 2.6.33.7.
I also intend to upload 2.6.35 to experimental shortly.
Shout if there's anything I should wait for
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 this weekend,
incorporating stable releases 2.6.32.16 and (for drm drivers) 2.6.33.6.
This does not appear to require an ABI bump.
Shout if there's anything I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve i
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.32-12 tomorrow. This includes various
ABI changes, so the ABI version will be bumped to 5. Propagation to
testing is currently blocked by bug #572618, which is not fixed by this
version, but I do have a briefly-tested fix from upstream and hope to
get confirmation
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:50:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [10
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >
> > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > > unless it gets a stable ABI
* Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > >
> > > > I guess this means that the next version i
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 20:02:31 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >
> > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > > unless it gets a stable ABI (
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
> > from migrating for the time
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
>> unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
>> from migrating for the time being?
>>
> The 2.6.30 kernel and th
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
> from migrating for the time being?
>
The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't can
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Ben Hutchings wrote:
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
> > > early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
> > > Therefore I p
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
> > early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
> > Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
> > released.
>
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
> early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
> Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
> released.
>
> (Still no stable ABI, sorry.)
If the ABI chan
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
released.
(Still no stable ABI, sorry.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning
I intend to upload linux-2.6 including the changes from 2.6.32.3 once
that's released (probably in the next 2 days). This includes fixes for
the build failures in vserver on ia64 and s390. Let me know if you have
any objections or other changes that I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Hor
73 matches
Mail list logo
