> c) only i386 still makes it useless since we're releasing for *six*
>architectures.
Sparc does not want, nor need this overhead since we don't have the problems
that require it's use. Further more, a static dpkg/apt compiled on potato
has the potential to not even run on a slink system, if i
Previously J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> Well, it has taken some time because nobody felt like recompiling i386
> apt/dpkg, but things are finally ready.
Oh come on!
a) As dpkg maintainer I never got a request to rebuild it
b) As far as I know the release manager never agreed that this was going
to be
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 04:49:54PM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> > Okay. Will a developer-signed "fake" .changes file with md5sum of the
> > upgrade-all.tar do? Does it have to be placed in Incoming (on ftp-master I
> > guess) or can you just fetch it
3 matches
Mail list logo
