On 09.06.2012 19:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 18:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Everything looks good and the old libraries were decrufted
(increasing
fossology's brokenness). The original upload would be over 10 days
old
now, so I'm looking at aging things for tonight's
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 18:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Everything looks good and the old libraries were decrufted (increasing
> fossology's brokenness). The original upload would be over 10 days old
> now, so I'm looking at aging things for tonight's britney run to get
> this off the to-do li
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 21:04 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 00:46:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Michal Čihař (04/06/2012):
> > > All of them build just fine against new RPM with exception of fossology
> > > which did already FTBFS [1]. There is no need to binNMU rp
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 00:46:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michal Čihař (04/06/2012):
> > All of them build just fine against new RPM with exception of fossology
> > which did already FTBFS [1]. There is no need to binNMU rpm2html as I've
> > already uploaded new version with few other fixe
Michal Čihař (04/06/2012):
> All of them build just fine against new RPM with exception of fossology
> which did already FTBFS [1]. There is no need to binNMU rpm2html as I've
> already uploaded new version with few other fixes.
Thanks.
Scheduled level 1: dose2 + dose3. ceve + pkglab will follow
Hi
Dne Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:42:26 +0200
Cyril Brulebois napsal(a):
> There aren't too many reverse dependencies. Please have a look at them,
> and file serious bugs if they FTBFS or aren't functional with those new
> rpm libraries. If it doesn't look too bad, I think we can still make
> this trans
Hello Michal.
Michal Čihař (04/06/2012):
> Sorry about that, my original plan was to upload it to experimental
> (and ask for transition later, but still preferably before freeze)
(Ideally, you would have asked at least 2 weeks ago…)
> but I messed it up (and did not notice till now). In case y
Hi
Dne Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:00:32 +0200
Cyril Brulebois napsal(a):
> here's an extract of Artur's mail, telling us about the uncoordinated
> rpm transition you started:
>
> Artur Rona (02/06/2012):
> > I've noticed that new revision of rpm source package ha
Hi Michal,
here's an extract of Artur's mail, telling us about the uncoordinated
rpm transition you started:
Artur Rona (02/06/2012):
> I've noticed that new revision of rpm source package has been
> uploaded this week and introduced new binary packages names.
> Ho
9 matches
Mail list logo
