Re: Uncoordinated libfsotransport transition

2012-06-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (24/05/2012): > That could look like it, but your packages might get entangled in some > other transition, making it painful for everyone. Also, we usually > coordinate with ftpmasters the removal of old binaries, so that the > packages can migrate as soon as they are ready (otherw

Re: Uncoordinated libfsotransport transition

2012-05-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello, and thanks for the quick answer. Sebastian Reichel (24/05/2012): > binNMU should work without FTBFS, but as I said we will update the > packages this week, so I guess binNMU is not needed. OK. > pkg-fso is the Maintainer of all reverse dependencies, so I assumed > that coordination with

Re: Uncoordinated libfsotransport transition

2012-05-24 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi Cyril, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:26:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libfsotransport0 > to libfsotransport1. That can be seen on the excuses page, and that > explains why your package isn't migrating: We plan to switch away from git

Uncoordinated libfsotransport transition

2012-05-23 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Debian FreeSmartphone.Org Team, it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libfsotransport0 to libfsotransport1. That can be seen on the excuses page, and that explains why your package isn't migrating: | libfsotransport (0.9.8+git20110805-1 to 0.9.8+git20120308-1) | | Maintai