Re: Timing on `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new default

Paul Gevers: Hi Niels, Hi Paul Thanks for the feedback. On 29-12-2024 11:12, Niels Thykier wrote:   * Do you think it is feasible for us to do this change in Trixie and,     if so, do you have any preferences for timing or bug counts that we     should keep in mind? If you are committing

Re: Timing on `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new default

Hi Niels, On 29-12-2024 11:12, Niels Thykier wrote:  * Do you think it is feasible for us to do this change in Trixie and,    if so, do you have any preferences for timing or bug counts that we    should keep in mind? If you are committing yourself to solve the issues (as you say, one line

Re: Timing on `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new default

Niels Thykier: Hi Release team, Hi, Please CC me OR debian-dpkg@l.d.o on replies. I am not subscribed to d-release. [...] With this in mind:  * Do you think it is feasible for us to do this change in Trixie and,    if so, do you have any preferences for timing or bug counts that we  

Timing on `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new default

Hi Release team, I could use your views on the `Rules-Requires-Root: no` MBF/transition here. Concretely, I am looking for your gut feeling on if/when we commit to the MBF and have the remaining bugs bumped to RC. While I have no doubt this counts part of the "transition and toolchain freeze",