On Sunday 09 July 2006 21:59, Frans Pop wrote:
> Seems like the i386 packages have now made it in. Still missing:
> - linux-kernel-di-arm
> - linux-kernel-di-m68k
> - linux-kernel-di-mips
> - linux-kernel-di-mipsel
> - linux-kernel-di-powerpc
Oops. Did not look correctly: i386 is still missing too
On Friday 07 July 2006 18:31, Frans Pop wrote:
> Most of the new kernel udeb packages are now in p-u, except for those
> that did not have to go through NEW:
[...]
> Please approve these for p-u ASAP.
Seems like the i386 packages have now made it in. Still missing:
- linux-kernel-di-arm
- linux-ke
Hi,
okay with me.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 23:08, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Dann has today uploaded the kernel udeb packages for all arches, except
> > for AMD64 (as that has not yet been released by the security team).
>
On Friday 30 June 2006 23:08, Frans Pop wrote:
> Dann has today uploaded the kernel udeb packages for all arches, except
> for AMD64 (as that has not yet been released by the security team).
> Most of them are currently in NEW, all need to be approved for proposed
> updates. When that has happened,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:16:51AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>> >>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM
On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:40, Frans Pop wrote:
> For most architectures this looks OK, except for the following:
> - S/390 kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o
> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn
> the kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >>
> >>> - For mips the r4k and r5k ker
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>>
>>> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn the
>>> kernel udebs don't match
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>>
>>> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn the
>>> kernel udebs don't match
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn the
>> kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o
>
>hey Steve: would you mind rebuilding this o
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> For most architectures this looks OK, except for the following:
> - AMD64 kernel udebs don't match as AMD64 kernel image not yet on
> s.d.o
nothing to do till amd64 makes it
> - S/390 kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o
I wi
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:59:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:40, Frans Pop wrote:
> > - dannf has updated 2.2.25 kernel udebs for m68k, but I can find no
> > matching security update for those on s.d.o
>
> Probably this is not an issue.
> I suspect there actually is
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> - m68k kernel udebs were originally built incorrectly; I understood this
> has been corrected but new udebs are not yet available in gluck:~dannf
Should still be at gluck:~smarenka/m68k-lkdi-take2
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's
On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:40, Frans Pop wrote:
> - dannf has updated 2.2.25 kernel udebs for m68k, but I can find no
> matching security update for those on s.d.o
Probably this is not an issue.
I suspect there actually is no security update for the m68k 2.2.25
kernels. The kernel udebs do ma
On Friday 23 June 2006 23:07, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> We have no fixed "freeze" date for r3 yet, but i currently plan to
> freeze one or two weeks after the pending 2.6 kernel update is pushed
> by the security team. If this is not enough time for the porters,
> please cluebat me.
Current stat
Hi security-team,
> I currently consider #373854 as RC for r3, and ask the security team to
> either update it with another DSA or to tell us if we should fix it via
> proposed-updates.
I also recently became aware off #374733, #375120, #373581 and #373980
(all package libfreetype6, in connection
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:07:51PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> I currently consider #373854 as RC for r3, and ask the security team to
> either update it with another DSA or to tell us if we should fix it via
> proposed-updates.
I think there should be an update for this, Joey if you ag
Hi,
to keep everyone in the loop i would like to discuss my current plans
for the r3 timeline.
We have no fixed "freeze" date for r3 yet, but i currently plan to
freeze one or two weeks after the pending 2.6 kernel update is pushed by
the security team. If this is not enough time for the porters,
18 matches
Mail list logo
