Matthias Klose wrote:
> Afaiu the security team also doesn't care
> about these ports when they fail to build for security updates.
Indeed. The openjdk updates are already really time-consuming, we can't
afford additional update rounds for exotic archs without official upstream
support.
Cheers,
On 15.09.2016 22:43, Helge Deller wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 10.09.2016 00:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> While the Debian Release team has some citation about the quality of the
>> toolchain on their status page, it is not one of the release criteria
>> documented
>> by the release team. I'd li
Hi Matthias,
On 10.09.2016 00:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> While the Debian Release team has some citation about the quality of the
> toolchain on their status page, it is not one of the release criteria
> documented
> by the release team. I'd like to document the status how I do understand it
>
On 09/10/2016 12:48 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Uncovered by the upstream primary and secondary platforms are the mips*
> architectures and powerpc. For the uncovered archs I would expect somehow
> more
> and pro-active Debian maintenance, however I fail to see this happen.
>
> - see the histor
While the Debian Release team has some citation about the quality of the
toolchain on their status page, it is not one of the release criteria documented
by the release team. I'd like to document the status how I do understand it for
some of the toolchains available in Debian.
I appreciate that t
8 matches
Mail list logo
