Re: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-29 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ivo" == Ivo De Decker writes: Ivo> Hi, Given that there is still discussion about the impact of Ivo> merged /usr at this very late point of the freeze, I think Ivo> having merged /usr by default for new installations should be Ivo> reconsidered. What discussion are you see

Re: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-29 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, Given that there is still discussion about the impact of merged /usr at this very late point of the freeze, I think having merged /usr by default for new installations should be reconsidered. On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > I've been debating doing this, but con

Re: Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: > > Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian > Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"): &

Re: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-19 Thread Sam Hartman
>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"): >> Control: severity -1 serious >> >> In #923091, G

Re: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-13 Thread Ian Jackson
(sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"): > Control: severity -1 serious > > In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a > base-installer option to allow installing bus