Re: Bug#379090: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Otavio Salvador
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: [...] >> Adding amd64 as subarch to i386 would mean 3 additional flavors to >> build, raising the overall build-time of that package by 1.5-2h. > > Which doesn't sound like a blocker to

Re: Bug#379090: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:30:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Can someone from the kernel team comment on whether there are problems with > > this particular patch that have not yet been noted in the bug report? If > > the

Re: Bug#379090: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 15:01]: >> Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I asked this before and haven't yet recieved an answere: >> >> What does w-b do when the amd64 build uploads amd64+i386 64bit kernel >> debs b

Re: Bug#379090: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Andreas Barth
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 15:01]: > Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I asked this before and haven't yet recieved an answere: > > What does w-b do when the amd64 build uploads amd64+i386 64bit kernel > debs but not 32bit. Afaik the package should be detected

Re: Bug#379090: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:30:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >> Can someone from the kernel team comment on whether there are problems with >> this particular patch that have not yet been noted in the bug report? If >> there aren't any

Re: Bug#379090: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:30:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Can someone from the kernel team comment on whether there are problems with > this particular patch that have not yet been noted in the bug report? If > there aren't any known objections, I could review the patch myself and

Re: Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > just a small reminder that etch still has no 64bit kernels for > i386. This is a regression from sarge which has them. The bug > (#379090) has a simple patch to reintroduce those kernel images (+5/-1 > lines code change and th

Still no news on 64bit i386 kernels

2006-10-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, just a small reminder that etch still has no 64bit kernels for i386. This is a regression from sarge which has them. The bug (#379090) has a simple patch to reintroduce those kernel images (+5/-1 lines code change and the rest is config) for nearly 100 days without a comment so far. Would it