Re: Status of python packages (20031010)

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 02:15:39AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > It doesn't appear to be a problem in the simulations I've done. I > haven't dug into the details, but I'm inclined to trust them. > As I make it, things are looking pretty good. Here are the things that > break when hinting python2.3

Re: Status of python packages (20031010)

2003-10-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:17:07AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > changes from 20031007: > - missing powerpc builds done > - all but one m68k builds done > - many missing mips builds done Yay! > how will the migration of qt/kde go? can it be separated from the > python migration? It doesn't a

Status of python packages (20031010)

2003-10-10 Thread Matthias Klose
changes from 20031007: - missing powerpc builds done - all but one m68k builds done - many missing mips builds done how will the migration of qt/kde go? can it be separated from the python migration? buggy: eoroaster (#211403, missing dependencies?, needs work) packages waiting in new