Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-09-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 20.08.2009 16:52, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Bastian Blank a écrit : >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two proposals: - define a new sparc64 port, and

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-09-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 20.08.2009 16:52, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two proposals: - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port. T

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-09-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06.09.2009 16:49, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:20:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 19.08.2009 16:33, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-09-06 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:20:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 19.08.2009 16:33, Bastian Blank wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: > >>>On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I d

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Bastian Blank a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two >> proposals: >> - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port. > > This is rather easy. I already did

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:53:08AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > It's not intended that multiarch supports switching architectures. It's also just an upgrade. Or did I miss something that would make it impossible to replace perl/i386 with perl/amd64? Bastian -- Many Myths are based on truth

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 19.08.2009 16:33, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two proposal

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all > > > library packages to i

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all > > library packages to implement biarch semantic. > ... which will be needed anyways. So your c

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how t

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two >>> proposals: >>> - have an inplace-transit

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two proposals: - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port. This is rather easy. I alre

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two > proposals: > - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port. This is rather easy. I already did a s390x bootstrap using this meth

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.08.2009 22:43, Jurij Smakov wrote: Hello, I would like to point out that sparc release requalification is currently placing it in "at risk" position for squeeze release. The most serious problems with the port are lack of developer involvement (there is currently one act