Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

tags 752532 + wheezy-ignore tags 752533 + wheezy-ignore tags 752534 + wheezy-ignore tags 752535 + wheezy-ignore tags 752537 + wheezy-ignore tags 752614 + wheezy-ignore tags 752616 + wheezy-ignore tags 752618 + wheezy-ignore tags 752628 + wheezy-ignore tags 752629 + wheezy-ignore tags 752630 + wheez

Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

Hi, On Sonntag, 6. Juli 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: > > while going through the list of (new) RC bugs claiming to affect wheezy, > > I noticed a whole bunch of "$foo is licensed under the PHP license and > > is not PHP" ones and am wondering if removal from stable is planned as > > well. > > Is it

Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 17:01:37 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > while going through the list of (new) RC bugs claiming to affect wheezy, I > noticed a whole bunch of "$foo is licensed under the PHP license and is not > PHP" ones and am wondering if removal from stable is planned as well.

Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

Hi, while going through the list of (new) RC bugs claiming to affect wheezy, I noticed a whole bunch of "$foo is licensed under the PHP license and is not PHP" ones and am wondering if removal from stable is planned as well. Is it? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a