Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-21 Thread Luk Claes
Josselin Mouette wrote: > gnome-settings-daemon (2.22.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low > > gnome-power-manager (2.22.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > > gksu (2.0.0-6) unstable; urgency=low > > epiphany-browser (2.22.3-8) unstable; urgency=low > > fontconfig (2.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low All unblock

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 18 novembre 2008 à 22:37 +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit : > > Unfortunately I don’t know of a means to reliably detect whether we’re > > reconfiguring. Maybe by checking if fontconfig is in "installed" state, > > but I feel this would be hackish. > > Maybe a dpkg trigger in the fontconfig pa

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-18 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-11-18 21:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 18 novembre 2008 à 20:01 +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit : >> Apart from /etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf and the new symlink >> in /etc/fonts/conf.d to it there seems to be no difference. > > Indeed; which means the configuration

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 18 novembre 2008 à 20:01 +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit : > > I really can’t reproduce #505994. Maybe you should check the symbolic > > links and files in /etc/fonts; with enabled_bitmaps=true, the > > configuration should be exactly the same between 2.6.0-1 and -3. > > Well, here is the lis

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-18 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-11-18 17:36 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 18 novembre 2008 à 17:13 +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit : >> > fontconfig (2.6.0-3) unstable; urgency=low >> > >> > * Remove doc/Makefile and doc/version.sgml in the clean target. >> > * Ship a minimal 70-yes-bitmaps.conf to avoid spur

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 18 novembre 2008 à 17:13 +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit : > > fontconfig (2.6.0-3) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * Remove doc/Makefile and doc/version.sgml in the clean target. > > * Ship a minimal 70-yes-bitmaps.conf to avoid spurious warnings. > > Closes: #505969. > > * fontconfig

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-18 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-11-18 09:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 16 novembre 2008 à 21:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : >> fontconfig (2.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low >> >>* Do not enable bitmap fonts by default. Closes: #496716. >> + rules: ship an empty 70-yes-bitmaps.conf and renam

Re: Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 16 novembre 2008 à 21:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > fontconfig (2.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low > >* Do not enable bitmap fonts by default. Closes: #496716. > + rules: ship an empty 70-yes-bitmaps.conf and rename the original >to 70-force-bitmaps.conf. > +

Some unblock requests, again

2008-11-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, it’s unblock request time! Today, we have the following: gnome-settings-daemon (2.22.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * 08_extra_touchpad_options.patch: removed broken patch from Ubuntu. Closes: #481191. * 11_sleepkey.patch: use gnome-power-cmd to suspend the computer instead of

Re: Some unblock requests

2008-09-04 Thread Luk Claes
Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:06:43AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >>> pyrex 0.9.7.2-0.1 >>> python-coverage 2.80-2 >>> network-manager-openvpn 0.3.2svn2855-1.1 >>> inn 1:1.7.2q-37 >>> gonzui 1.2+cvs20070129-1.1 >> All unblocked > > Many thanks. Please also consider the RC bug fix f

Re: Some unblock requests

2008-09-04 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:06:43AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > pyrex 0.9.7.2-0.1 > > python-coverage 2.80-2 > > network-manager-openvpn 0.3.2svn2855-1.1 > > inn 1:1.7.2q-37 > > gonzui 1.2+cvs20070129-1.1 > > All unblocked Many thanks. Please also consider the RC bug fix for python-pyrss2gen (the

Re: Some unblock requests

2008-09-03 Thread Luk Claes
Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian Release, > > Even though I was not involved with these uploads, I would presume > that these would require review and, possibly, unblocking on the part > of the release managers for migration to Lenny. In case there are any > errors or missing checks, please let

Some unblock requests

2008-09-02 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Debian Release, Even though I was not involved with these uploads, I would presume that these would require review and, possibly, unblocking on the part of the release managers for migration to Lenny. In case there are any errors or missing checks, please let me know, so that I can avoid it i