On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > >> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
> > >> Thursday, 12th October.
>
> >
* Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 22:52]:
> * Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
> Yes.
>
> > Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
>
> Tomorrow.
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
t
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 06:43]:
> Even if the kernel cannot be built with 4.1, it would be nice to have
> bug reports. I'm not aware of any alpha related reports, although it's
> not my pet arch.
Of course.
> I'm still planning not to build g++-4.0 from the 4.0 sources, now t
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]:
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > > Two big issues are still open:
> > > > - hppa FTBFS
> > > > - alpha gcc-4.
* Jurij Smakov wrote:
> What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
Yes.
> Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
Tomorrow.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> >> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
> >> Thursday, 12th October.
> > Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the f
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
>> Thursday, 12th October.
>
> Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following issues.
>
>> Two big issues are still ope
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:41:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
> > Thursday, 12th October.
>
> Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > Two big issues are still open:
> > > - hppa FTBFS
> > > - alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency
> > What should
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> So, the only two options seem to me:
> b) we ship with what we have in etch now, that is 2.6.17.
This is no option.
Bastian
--
Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Two big issues are still open:
> > - hppa FTBFS
> > - alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency
>
> What should we do with them? Finally disable alpha and hppa(64)?
I don't think it i
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
> Thursday, 12th October.
Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following issues.
> Two big issues are still open:
> - hppa FTBFS
> - alpha gcc-4
12 matches
Mail list logo
