Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 10:53:09AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > > >[sorry for the delay in replying] > > > > > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >[sorry for the delay in replying] > > > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. H

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >[sorry for the delay in replying] > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >It'

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/07/17 16:34, Charles Chambers wrote: > Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs > installing 9.0 can be worked out? > > It is summer, after all. There will be a 9.2 release. Whatever doesn't get included in 9.1 can be fixed in 9.2. If we applied that argume

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-04 Thread Charles Chambers
Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs installing 9.0 can be worked out? It is summer, after all. On Jun 25, 2017 12:10 PM, "Jonathan Wiltshire" wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-02 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July > > [SRMs: needs one of you too please :

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[sorry for the delay in replying] On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? It's worked before. > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Definitely now too

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-27 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14714 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July Both of them don't work for me. > 22/23 July That I could do. -- bye, Joerg

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-25): > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these week-ends, so no prefer

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Impossible for me, I'm busy all weekend. >15/16 July >22/23 July Both

Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) 15/16 July 22/23 July [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.or