* Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051019 20:49]:
> I think build-deps currenlty only need to be satisfied in sid, but they
> might need to be satisfied in testing too at a later time in the
> release cycle, is this correct?
Technically spoken, we always require this. But if in the forseeable
f
Hi,
I think build-deps currenlty only need to be satisfied in sid, but they
might need to be satisfied in testing too at a later time in the
release cycle, is this correct?
I ask because of gnome-games which had a versionned build-dep on
binutils (because it used --as-needed), and cu
2 matches
Mail list logo