Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you allow gxine 0.5.8-3 into etch? Several intermittently-triggered
> bugs which cause gxine to hang and for which fixes are in 0.5.9 and later are
> fixed. No actual bugs are present in the BTS for these, but I would consider
> at least some to be im
Could you allow gxine 0.5.8-3 into etch? Several intermittently-triggered
bugs which cause gxine to hang and for which fixes are in 0.5.9 and later are
fixed. No actual bugs are present in the BTS for these, but I would consider
at least some to be important. (If you disagree about severity, whethe
Darren Salt wrote:
> Could you allow gxine 0.5.8-2 into etch? Reason is that it fixes bug 405876,
> "segfault on startup with long HOME dir" (which is tagged important, but
> gxine is an optional package).
Unblocked (has to wait for xulrunner to reach testing and builds on all arches).
Cheers
Lu
On 2007-01-08, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you allow gxine 0.5.8-2 into etch? Reason is that it fixes bug 405876,
> "segfault on startup with long HOME dir" (which is tagged important, but
> gxine is an optional package).
>
> This version also enables the watchdog code. I chose t
Could you allow gxine 0.5.8-2 into etch? Reason is that it fixes bug 405876,
"segfault on startup with long HOME dir" (which is tagged important, but
gxine is an optional package).
This version also enables the watchdog code. I chose this over some locking
bug fixes as the "safer" alternative (it
5 matches
Mail list logo
