On 10/09/2010 03:17 PM, Andrew McMillan wrote:
Do you mean that the current good versions from unstable won't be
part of squeeze?
After reading your first mail, I would not describe them as "good".
Or are you suggesting that the whole thing will be excluded just
because I have now pointed
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 19:35 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Really, it's too late for such big updates. I'm afraid that Awl and Davical
> won't be part of Squeeze.
Hi,
Do you mean that the current good versions from unstable won't be part
of squeeze?
Or are you suggesting that the whol
Hello,
Really, it's too late for such big updates. I'm afraid that Awl and Davical
won't be part of Squeeze.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
Hi,
I would like to request a freeze exception for the DAViCal and AWL
packages for Squeeze to accept version 0.9.9.3 of DAViCal and 0.45 of
AWL.
The following points apply:
1) I am the upstream developer and the Debian packager. This is not an
ideal situation, as everyone knows, and in particu
4 matches
Mail list logo