Re: Request for freeze exception for DAViCal / AWL packages

2010-10-09 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/09/2010 03:17 PM, Andrew McMillan wrote: Do you mean that the current good versions from unstable won't be part of squeeze? After reading your first mail, I would not describe them as "good". Or are you suggesting that the whole thing will be excluded just because I have now pointed

Re: Request for freeze exception for DAViCal / AWL packages

2010-10-09 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 19:35 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Hello, > > Really, it's too late for such big updates. I'm afraid that Awl and Davical > won't be part of Squeeze. Hi, Do you mean that the current good versions from unstable won't be part of squeeze? Or are you suggesting that the whol

Re: Request for freeze exception for DAViCal / AWL packages

2010-10-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Hello, Really, it's too late for such big updates. I'm afraid that Awl and Davical won't be part of Squeeze. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...

Request for freeze exception for DAViCal / AWL packages

2010-10-07 Thread Andrew McMillan
Hi, I would like to request a freeze exception for the DAViCal and AWL packages for Squeeze to accept version 0.9.9.3 of DAViCal and 0.45 of AWL. The following points apply: 1) I am the upstream developer and the Debian packager. This is not an ideal situation, as everyone knows, and in particu