Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> afaict there are currently no hints for getting ri

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Luk Claes
Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Andreas Metzler wrote: >>> On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Metzler wrote: > afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and > letting icedove in instead. >

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andreas Metzler wrote: > >>> afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and > >>> letting icedove in instead. > >> No, I didn't add hints

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Luk Claes
Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Andreas Metzler wrote: >>> afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and >>> letting icedove in instead. > >> No, I didn't add hints because thunderbird source package still leaves >> packages w

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-11-04 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and > > letting icedove in instead. > No, I didn't add hints because thunderbird source package still leaves > packages which are not in icedove source

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Luk Claes
Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello, Hi > afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and > letting icedove in instead. No, I didn't add hints because thunderbird source package still leaves packages which are not in icedove source package (as meta transition package). > icedo

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2006-11-04 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] >>> icedove has one rc-bug currently (#395095), it contains non-free rfc >>> documents. However th

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-11-04 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: [...] >> icedove has one rc-bug currently (#395095), it contains non-free rfc >> documents. However this bug applies to both thunderbird and icedove, >> as

Re: Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and > letting icedove in instead. > > remove thunderbird/1.5.0.7-2 > > icedove has one rc-bug currently (#395095), it contains non-fr

Replacing thunderbird with icedove

2006-11-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and letting icedove in instead. remove thunderbird/1.5.0.7-2 icedove has one rc-bug currently (#395095), it contains non-free rfc documents. However this bug applies to both thunderbird and icedove, as their source tarballs