* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120519 22:19]:
> One question which has come up quite a bit recently is whether we should
> remove armhf and s390x from one or both of {broken,fucked}arches. Doing
> so doesn't necessarily imply making them release architectures,
> particularly while w
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 22:26 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (19/05/2012):
> > One question which has come up quite a bit recently is whether we should
> > remove armhf and s390x from one or both of {broken,fucked}arches. Doing
> > so doesn't necessarily imply making them release a
Adam D. Barratt (19/05/2012):
> One question which has come up quite a bit recently is whether we should
> remove armhf and s390x from one or both of {broken,fucked}arches. Doing
> so doesn't necessarily imply making them release architectures,
> particularly while we're not treating arch-specifi
3 matches
Mail list logo
