Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:03:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Luk Claes wrote: > > > If it's only about the security bug, I don't think it's a good idea to > > > remove > > &

Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Luk Claes wrote: > > If it's only about the security bug, I don't think it's a good idea to > > remove > > giflib from testing at this time as the bug can easily be fixed by giflib > >

Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-04 Thread Daniel Baumann
Luk Claes wrote: > If it's only about the security bug, I don't think it's a good idea to remove > giflib from testing at this time as the bug can easily be fixed by giflib > leaving the NEW queue or patching giflib 3 AFAICS. Though if you think giflib > 3.x is not

Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-04 Thread Luk Claes
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, Hi Daniel :-) > giflib 3.x has a nasty security bug (#395382). I uploaded giflib 4.x to > NEW two days ago, which fixed, amongst others, this bug. > But in the meantime while waiting for NEW, I recommend to remove giflib > from testing. If it&#

Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-04 Thread Daniel Baumann
Daniel Baumann wrote: > no package[0] does declare a relation to giflib [0] except vorlons libfnlib-dev which declares: Depends: imlib11-dev, libfnlib0 (= 0.5-13), libjpeg62-dev, libpng3-dev, libtiff4-dev, zlib1g-dev, libungif4-dev | libungif3g-dev | giflib3g-dev ^^

Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-04 Thread Daniel Baumann
tansition after etch release. But in the meantime while waiting for NEW, I recommend to remove giflib from testing. Regards, Daniel [0] - -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.n