Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-07-11 Thread Luk Claes
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On 2009-06-27, Luk Claes wrote: >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> On 2009-06-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> xemacs21 > All removed Thanks.

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-07-09 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2009-06-27, Luk Claes wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> On 2009-06-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > xemacs21 All removed >>> Thanks. All have been removed now with the

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-06-27 Thread Luk Claes
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On 2009-06-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern wrote: >>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: xemacs21 >>> All removed >> Thanks. All have been removed now with the exception of xemacs21. >> I suppose that

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-06-27 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2009-06-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> xemacs21 >> >> All removed > > Thanks. All have been removed now with the exception of xemacs21. > I suppose that's because toolbar-fancy (

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-06-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> xemacs21 > > All removed Thanks. All have been removed now with the exception of xemacs21. I suppose that's because toolbar-fancy (which is xemacs21-specific) needs to be removed along.

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Barry deFreese
Adeodato Simó wrote: libjsw All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 <- 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gw

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Barry deFreese
Adeodato Simó wrote: libjsw All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 <- 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gw

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
> > libjsw > All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 <- 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gwave, jscalibrator, libguilegtk-

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > icewm > linpopup > wmclockmon > cheops > codebreaker > gaby > dbmix > gcrontab > gbuffy > gcvs > gcx > geg > gman > gps > gqcam > gtkpool > libjsw > i2e > mah-jong > mbrowse > predict > xemacs21 > swami > xoscope > xscorch > Al