Hi,
back from vacation, I'm working on my mail backlog.
I've been told that -release is not a discussion list. What would be a
more appropriate list for discussing release goals and release
strategies?
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:02:47AM -0700, Thoma
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:02:47AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 13:30 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > [Trying to reply for Frank, since he's on vacation...]
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This particular problem only exists because you're providi
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the problem is that the new packages aren't a superset; you
> can't reliably put in the new package and expect all the previously
> working bits to still keep working.
Which specific problem are you referring to?
--
Florent
--
To UNSUB
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 13:30 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> [Trying to reply for Frank, since he's on vacation...]
>
> Hi,
>
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This particular problem only exists because you're providing tetex-bin and
> > tetex-extra packages that don't have the sa
[Trying to reply for Frank, since he's on vacation...]
Hi,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This particular problem only exists because you're providing tetex-bin and
> tetex-extra packages that don't have the same semantics as previous
> versions.
As Frank explained, it is impossibl
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:50:47AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> - tetex-bin and tetex-extra do still exist, as metapackages, and we
> >> would like to have the freedom to change their dependencies as we
> >> learn about users' needs, without bothe
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - tetex-bin and tetex-extra do still exist, as metapackages, and we
>> would like to have the freedom to change their dependencies as we
>> learn about users' needs, without bothering whether some package is
>> broken by this.
>
> Which precisely
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 07:32:58PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I think this is a useful case for mass-bugfiling, and that any NMUers
> > of the affected packages should consider fixing these issues /when an NMU is
> > already needed/, it's my im
Hi Frank,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:10:09PM CEST, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
>
> "No dependencies (Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Build-Depends{-Indep}) on
> tetex-* and texlive-full, only justified dep
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I think this is a useful case for mass-bugfiling, and that any NMUers
> of the affected packages should consider fixing these issues /when an NMU is
> already needed/, it's my impression that the alternative dependency is of
> only superficial impo
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:10:09PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
> the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
> "No dependencies (Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Build-Depends{-Indep}) on
> tetex-* and texlive-full, only justified dep's on texlive",
> with the userta
Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Frank
> I wonder why nobody answered to this - when and/or how will it be
> decided whether this is a release goal?
The current status of proposed Release Goals can be found on
http://release.debian.org/lenny-goals.txt as was mentioned in the Release Team
Meeting res
Hi,
I wonder why nobody answered to this - when and/or how will it be
decided whether this is a release goal?
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
>
> "No dependencies (Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Build-Depends{
Dear Release Team,
the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
"No dependencies (Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Build-Depends{-Indep}) on
tetex-* and texlive-full, only justified dep's on texlive",
with the usertag-shortname "texlive-transition"
with the rationale:
,
| The tetex
14 matches
Mail list logo
