Re: Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libvirt0

2009-08-06 Thread Luk Claes
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 02 Aug 2009, Luk Claes wrote: >>> due to the invalid symbols file in libvirt0 (#536482) some packages have >>> to be rebuilt to get a properly versioned dependency... here comes the >>> list. >> Can you please send an updated list, TIA? > > The list doe

Re: Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libvirt0

2009-08-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Sun, 02 Aug 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > due to the invalid symbols file in libvirt0 (#536482) some packages have > > to be rebuilt to get a properly versioned dependency... here comes the > > list. > > Can you please send an updated list, TIA? The list doesn't have to be updated AFAIK.

Re: Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libvirt0

2009-08-02 Thread Luk Claes
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > due to the invalid symbols file in libvirt0 (#536482) some packages have > to be rebuilt to get a properly versioned dependency... here comes the > list. Can you please send an updated list, TIA? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l

Re: Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libvirt0

2009-07-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > You should schedule the bin-nmu only once the sparc build of libvirt0 > has been uploaded (hence ccing zobel as he takes care of that buildd). Already done, so you can go ahead with the bin-nmus. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libvirt0

2009-07-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, due to the invalid symbols file in libvirt0 (#536482) some packages have to be rebuilt to get a properly versioned dependency... here comes the list. You should schedule the bin-nmu only once the sparc build of libvirt0 has been uploaded (hence ccing zobel as he takes care of that buildd). (O