Re: texlive transition to testing

On Sa, 09 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote: > Not all of the rdeps that needed rebuilding are already rebuilt and a > hint is already in action... Ah thanks, sorry for bothering. I was just looking at the Excuses pages. Thanks for you good work and taking care of that, much appreciated. If there is any

Re: texlive transition to testing

Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Luk, > > On Mi, 06 Jan 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: >>> But there was the new RC bug wrt replaces. In a minute I will upload >>> texlive-base 2009-7 which fixes that and also several other things. >> Uploaded, you might to your liking adjust the needed days for >> tex

Re: texlive transition to testing

Hi Luk, On Mi, 06 Jan 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: > > But there was the new RC bug wrt replaces. In a minute I will upload > > texlive-base 2009-7 which fixes that and also several other things. > > Uploaded, you might to your liking adjust the needed days for > texlive-base ... Thanks for set

Re: texlive transition to testing

Hi Luk, On Di, 05 Jan 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: > But there was the new RC bug wrt replaces. In a minute I will upload > texlive-base 2009-7 which fixes that and also several other things. Uploaded, you might to your liking adjust the needed days for texlive-base ... Best wishes Norbert ---

Re: texlive transition to testing

On So, 03 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote: > Norbert Preining wrote: > > Anything else I might have forgotten? > > I have added some hints to get it into testing soon, lets monitor output > of next britney runs. Thanks Luk But there was the new RC bug wrt replaces. In a minute I will upload texlive-ba

Re: texlive transition to testing

Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all, > > checking the excuses for various texlive and related packages I see that > the last one open with more then 2 days is texlive-bin (4 of 10 days old). > > Does anyone here see any serious open problem with any of the packages, > or should we now wait that at