On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:07:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> > > please indicate as such; ot
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> > please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
> > maintainer to downgrade t
On 08/20/2010 01:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Daniel, can you please remove this binary package from unstable?
rather than that, i've downgraded the depends to suggests.
note that if you unblock live-config 2.0.x that you want to unblock
live-boot 2.0.x too.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 17:07:22 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> After some discussion, we feel that the fact that runit-run can be
> installed, and unless further manual action is taken, it will make the
> computer unbootable to indicate that the package is unreleaseable.
>
It's not getting remove
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
> maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
> feels that it is releasable
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * We decided to refer to the Release Team the question as to
>whether the package is releaseable in its current state.
>
> So, we would appreciate it if you would take a look at this situation
> and decide. When you've decided you should probably set
6 matches
Mail list logo
