Hi Colin,
just to keep you updated...
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:22:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Speaking of which, I would like to upload parted 2.2 to unstable (it's
> currently in experimental) once 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 reaches testing.
> The reason to try to get this into squeeze is th
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:01:06PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > and partitioner (mips only, d-boot maintained).
> Committed to Subversion, but needs a mips machine to upload it.
> gabrielli would do; can you install these build-dependencies, or should
> I go ask DSA?
It seems that DSA is not yet
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:03:30PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Philipp Kern a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
> >> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
Philipp Kern a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
>> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
>> migration due to kfreebsd issues being RC if the package has built
>>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> That still leaves gnu-fdisk (parted team maintained)
Oops; I'll follow up on this.
> and partitioner (mips only, d-boot maintained).
Committed to Subversion, but needs a mips machine to upload it.
gabrielli would do; can you install
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:38:07PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > The API version (libparted-2.1-
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
> migration due to kfreebsd issues being RC if the package has built
> successfully before.)
I was
Colin,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:38:07PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > The API version (libparted-2.1-dev, etc.) was used before upstream
> > > started setting a pr
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The API version (libparted-2.1-dev, etc.) was used before upstream
> > started setting a proper SONAME. Now that they do (that's new in parted
> > 2.2), I think it's ap
Hi Colin,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> The API version (libparted-2.1-dev, etc.) was used before upstream
> started setting a proper SONAME. Now that they do (that's new in parted
> 2.2), I think it's appropriate to name the package after it; I'm
> confident in
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:58:39PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> am Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:02:22AM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > > So with 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 theoretically every source package could
> > > switch its build-dep to libparted-dev already? Or are those supposed to
> > >
Colin,
am Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:02:22AM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> OK, what kind of timeline are we talking about? Luk said "not yet" a
> few days ago, although I wasn't clear what he was waiting for (not that
> I minded, I don't need to know the fine details).
I try to gather info
On 2010-03-17, Philipp Kern wrote:
> There are (at least) two qt packages involved, so that should be done before
> the qt transition starts.
Only one uses qt4. Partitionmanager.
Qtparted uses qt3 which is not going to be touched. Maybe qtparted
should even be removed, but I will let others loo
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43:27PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:22:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Speaking of which, I would like to upload parted 2.2 to unstable (it's
> > currently in experimental) once 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 reaches testing.
> > The reason to try
Hi Colin,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:22:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Could parted 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 be unblocked, please? It's needed
> to smooth the path for parted 2.2 in the near future.
that one already migrated to testing in the meantime, so that's done.
> Speaking of which, I wo
On 11.03.2010 13:22, Colin Watson wrote:
> drives, which are becoming increasingly common. There is an ABI
> transition involved, among the following source packages (maintainers
> devicekit-disks
As soon as gnome-disk-utility enters testing (hopefully in 10 days), I'll
request the removal of
Colin Watson wrote:
> Could parted 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 be unblocked, please? It's needed
> to smooth the path for parted 2.2 in the near future.
unblocked.
> Speaking of which, I would like to upload parted 2.2 to unstable (it's
> currently in experimental) once 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 reaches
17 matches
Mail list logo
