Hi,
Am Freitag, den 10.06.2011, 12:42 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> FWIW, ghc migrated during this morning's britney run.
Great. Took much longer for us to push this transition through than
expected, we need to work on that. Anyways, thanks to Mehdi for the
final hand-holding,
Joachim
--
Joach
On 09/06/2011 14:13, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> thanks a lot!
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
>> So, if you are happy breaking some arch:all packages from haskell-dummy,
>> we will do so.
>
> Yes. I actually think that an uninstallable dummy pack
Hi Mehdi,
thanks a lot!
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> So, if you are happy breaking some arch:all packages from haskell-dummy,
> we will do so.
Yes. I actually think that an uninstallable dummy package (indicating
the user: There is an upgrade path, it just d
On 09/06/2011 13:37, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 11:07, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>
>> Could you force-hint haskell-dummy? As long as haskell-hsql-mysql has
>> not migrated to testing, there is no upgrade path for the old
>> libghc6-hsql-mysql-dev anyways, so it should not be worse for the
On 09/06/2011 11:07, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> Could you force-hint haskell-dummy? As long as haskell-hsql-mysql has
> not migrated to testing, there is no upgrade path for the old
> libghc6-hsql-mysql-dev anyways, so it should not be worse for the
> users to have an uninstallable upgrade path
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 10:58 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> So, I did a new run with an updated set of hints (attached) and the result
> is the following:
>
> endloop: 85+0: i-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
> now: 114+0: i-30:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
>
On 06/09/2011 10:58 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> So, I did a new run with an updated set of hints (attached) and the result
> is the following:
>
> endloop: 85+0: i-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
> now: 114+0: i-30:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
> * i386: configfile-do
On 06/08/2011 04:05 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
>> - pandoc out-of-date on several architectures. It seems that it
>> needs highlighting-kate to build which is missing there. fwiw,
>> gitit needs pandoc.
>
> should be fixed now (by
Hi Mehdi,
small update and status review:
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> - pandoc out-of-date on several architectures. It seems that it needs
> highlighting-kate to build which is missing there. fwiw, gitit needs pandoc.
should be fixed now (by removing highlight
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:24:16 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
BTW, is it a problem to have the dummy packages from haskell-dummy,
which are arch all, depend on their libghc-*-dev counterpart even
though
it might not exist on all arches? Or is britney sati
On 07/06/2011 18:44, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
>> On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
pandoc is not migratable in its current state in sid. And, g
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> >> pandoc is not migratable in its current state in sid. And, gitit depends
> >> on pandoc. I tried to remove both
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
>> pandoc is not migratable in its current state in sid. And, gitit depends
>> on pandoc. I tried to remove both gigit and pandoc from testing during my
>> tests to see if ghc could migrate
Hi Mehdi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 06/06/2011 23:22, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > highlighting-kate is one of the big beasts that tend to fail on weaker
> > arches; on some of them it works with some buildds and not others.
> > Should I
> > * give back th
On 06/06/2011 23:22, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> highlighting-kate is one of the big beasts that tend to fail on weaker
> arches; on some of them it works with some buildds and not others.
> Should I
> * give back the package once or twice to find out if there is a strong
> buildd or
> * should
Hi Mehdi,
thanks for the investigations.
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 04/06/2011 13:26, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> > with the upload of haskell-debian we have finally migrated (or removed)
> > all packages to ghc instead of ghc6. Once -debian has waited fo
On 06/06/2011 18:16, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> endloop: 87+0: i-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-43:k-43:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
> now: 134+0: i-33:a-3:a-1:i-0:k-46:k-46:m-1:m-1:p-1:s-1:s-1
> * i386: configfile-doc, ftphs-doc, gitit, haskell-agda-doc,
> haskell-convertible-doc, haskell-cpphs-doc, haskell-edison-api
On 04/06/2011 13:26, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> with the upload of haskell-debian we have finally migrated (or removed)
> all packages to ghc instead of ghc6. Once -debian has waited for its 10
> days, I expect that the migration is possible, but of course there could
> be unforseen difficulties,
18 matches
Mail list logo
