Re: binnmus for libyaz transition

2010-06-23 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 23/06/2010 22:52, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > @Vincent: It would be nice if you could remove the soname from the -dev > package name. It's considered as a good practice and helps during > transitions. It depends if the API (not ABI) is broken or not. In this case (discussed with upstream), they have

Re: binnmus for libyaz transition

2010-06-23 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 23/06/2010 20:23, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > libyaz3 is apparently replaced by libyaz4 in unstable. idzebra still > depends on the old lib so needs a rebuild. Vincent, are source changes > needed or can this be fixed by binary NMUs? Also please refrain from > further yaz (and related pa

Re: binnmus for libyaz transition

2010-06-23 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 06/23/2010 09:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 20:46:55 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> >> A binNMU wouldn't fix the problem as idzebra build-depends on >> libyaz3-dev, which is not provided by any package. >> > Bah, didn't check that. > I NMUed idzebra (which builds jus

Re: binnmus for libyaz transition

2010-06-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 20:46:55 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 06/23/2010 08:23 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Hi, > > > > libyaz3 is apparently replaced by libyaz4 in unstable. idzebra still > > depends on the old lib so needs a rebuild. Vincent, are source > > changes needed or can this be

Re: binnmus for libyaz transition

2010-06-23 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 06/23/2010 08:23 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > libyaz3 is apparently replaced by libyaz4 in unstable. idzebra still > depends on the old lib so needs a rebuild. Vincent, are source > changes needed or can this be fixed by binary NMUs? Also please > refrain from further yaz (and relat