On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
> familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
> direction? What sort of lintian checks did you have in mind?
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> > > packages.
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to coordi
* Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > I have seen these two breakages (so far):
> >
> > libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
>
> This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
Ah yes,
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I have seen these two breakages (so far):
>
> libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
> gyrus: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724917
(g
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> > packages.
> >
> > Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
> > upload&deal with
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> packages.
>
> Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
> upload&deal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
Did the transition from
6 matches
Mail list logo
