Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-07 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:46:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Status is: I personally think we'll need to address this at some point but > it has never really been discussed within the team and I've no idea what > will be involved other than that it's likely to be invasive. > In other words: there

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-05 Thread Frans Pop
(No need to CC me: I read both lists) On Saturday 05 April 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > > If proper britney support was implemented there _are_ some udebs that > > could be done completely automatically, but there will always be cases > > where automated checks are insufficient. At least until we comp

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-05 Thread Luk Claes
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 07:25:15AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > > Note that this still only one reason why we need the acks. Preventing > > breakage is the other. > > Actually, the current klibc migration is a very nice example of this, so let > me elabora

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 04 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Note that this still only one reason why we need the acks. Preventing > breakage is the other. Actually, the current klibc migration is a very nice example of this, so let me elaborate. Yesterday we had the following message and commit: http://lists.de

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 04 April 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:22:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Fact of life is that ATM udebs need to be synced manually after a > > package migrates and that the D-I RM is the person who coordinates > > that, so even if a package is safe to migrate, h

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:22:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Fact of life is that ATM udebs need to be synced manually after a package > migrates and that the D-I RM is the person who coordinates that, so even if > a package is safe to migrate, he needs to know about it and the best way to > ach

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > It started with a request from maks to unblock mklibs which phil acted > > on without waiting for an OK from a D-I RM. > > klibc, not mklibs. Yes, sorry. Let me also note that my intent

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-03 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > It started with a request from maks to unblock mklibs which phil acted on > without waiting for an OK from a D-I RM. klibc, not mklibs. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer :

Re: Unblock of packages in "could be handled by britney"

2008-04-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: > today members of the Release Team wondered on IRC about when to unblock > udebs in the "could be handled by britney" section of the freeze hints > file while not being in any d-i beta freezes. For those who did not see the discussion on IRC, here's