"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
Hi,
> Yep. libimobiledevice0 was decrufted this morning (although too late for
> this morning's britney run) so everything should migrate tonight.
Looks like it did work, although update_excuses looks out of date.
Thanks!
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux
On Wed, April 28, 2010 11:36, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>> A more immediate issue is the libimobiledevice{0,1} rename.
>> libimobiledevice0 needs decrufting, which can't currently occur as
>> ipheth still depends on the old library. BinNMUs for that were
>> scheduled earlier
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
Hi,
> A more immediate issue is the libimobiledevice{0,1} rename.
> libimobiledevice0 needs decrufting, which can't currently occur as
> ipheth still depends on the old library. BinNMUs for that were
> scheduled earlier today and a quick test run suggests that a simple
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
Hi,
> usbmuxd has already transitioned, fwiw.
Yes, it's low enough in the stack that it wasn't affected by the
libplist issues.
> A more immediate issue is the libimobiledevice{0,1} rename.
> libimobiledevice0 needs decrufting, which can't currently occur as
> ipheth s
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:55 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> It looks like the iPhone/iPod stack will need some hints to make it to
> Squeeze. The stack comprises libplist, libimobiledevice, ifuse and
> usbmuxd.
usbmuxd has already transitioned, fwiw.
> Currently the blocker seems to be libimob
Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 17:55 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
> What should have been a seamless and entirely self-contained transition
> fell victim to portability issues in libplist, a rogue upload of a newer
> libimobiledevice version complete with a soname bump and GNOME packages
> starting to
6 matches
Mail list logo
