Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-09-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Andreas, thanks for the advice! Andreas Barth schrieb: Currently, both mpd and pulseaudio have RC bugs on them because they fail to build on armel, so resolving these bugs is a precondition for the move. Reading through the bug reports, it seems the pulseaudio bug is already addressed by addi

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-09-30 Thread Andreas Barth
* Fabian Greffrath (greffr...@leat.rub.de) [090930 11:26]: > Andreas Barth schrieb: >> Currently, both mpd and pulseaudio have RC bugs on them because they >> fail to build on armel, so resolving these bugs is a precondition for >> the move. > > Reading through the bug reports, it seems the pulseau

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-09-30 Thread Andreas Barth
* Fabian Greffrath (greffr...@leat.rub.de) [090930 10:23]: > Andreas Barth schrieb: >> As faad2 involves quite many packages, I'd be happy if someone would >> hunt for the missing bits. (Two candidates are mpd and pulseaudio, > > What does this exactly mean? How can we help here? Generally, check

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-09-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Andreas Barth schrieb: As faad2 involves quite many packages, I'd be happy if someone would hunt for the missing bits. (Two candidates are mpd and pulseaudio, What does this exactly mean? How can we help here? they need sourcefull uploads. Perhaps more packages, I put an hint in today so that

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-09-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) [090915 19:41]: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:01:34AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > >> On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:17:12 Luk Claes wrote: > >>> Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Pierre Habouzit schrieb: > > Okay, I should retract that, xine-

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-09-15 Thread Luk Claes
Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:01:34AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: >> On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:17:12 Luk Claes wrote: >>> Fabian Greffrath wrote: Pierre Habouzit schrieb: > Okay, I should retract that, xine-lib is part of the imagemagick > transition as well, s

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-08-07 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:01:34AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:17:12 Luk Claes wrote: > > Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > > Pierre Habouzit schrieb: > > >> Okay, I should retract that, xine-lib is part of the imagemagick > > >> transition as well, sorry that I missed that

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-08-06 Thread Andres Mejia
On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:17:12 Luk Claes wrote: > Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > Pierre Habouzit schrieb: > >> Okay, I should retract that, xine-lib is part of the imagemagick > >> transition as well, sorry that I missed that, we have to wait for it to > >> be done first, I'm sorry. > > > > Now t

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-08-06 Thread Luk Claes
Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Pierre Habouzit schrieb: >> Okay, I should retract that, xine-lib is part of the imagemagick >> transition as well, sorry that I missed that, we have to wait for it to >> be done first, I'm sorry. > > Now that the imagemagick transition is done, is it safe to upload > faa

Re: Please Don't !! (Was: faad2_2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED)

2009-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Pierre Habouzit schrieb: Okay, I should retract that, xine-lib is part of the imagemagick transition as well, sorry that I missed that, we have to wait for it to be done first, I'm sorry. Now that the imagemagick transition is done, is it safe to upload faad2_2.7 to unstable? -- Dipl.-Phys.