dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:46:34AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> CC: linux-paric mailing list
>>
>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> He
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:46:34AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> CC: linux-paric mailing list
>
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> >>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am D
CC: linux-paric mailing list
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> Patch in parisc git tree:
> htt
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> > >
> > >> Patch in parisc git tree:
> > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> >
> >> Patch in parisc git tree:
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 01:05:55PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > >> dann frazier wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Pete
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> >> dann frazier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezemb
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:23:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
>
> > Patch in parisc git tree:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf03213
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
>
>> Patch in parisc git tree:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf032137aacb3640d7dd9d75b2b607
>
> So just using a
Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> Patch in parisc git tree:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf032137aacb3640d7dd9d75b2b607
So just using an SMP kernel should also work?
-
dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> dann frazier wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
> Matt Taggart wrote:
>> The real problem is that
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 06:57:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
> >> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes st
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:27:38PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> >> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
> > [snip]
> >> What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd host?
> >=20
> > How about being a little bit sensible? a C100 will *never* be suitable
> > as a buildd hos
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
>> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes stuff
>> break on newer, faster hardware. And if we want to provide
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes stuff
> break on newer, faster hardware. And if we want to provide a stable and
> useful port
Christoph Martin schrieb am Freitag, dem 19. Dezember 2008:
> Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
>
> >
> > If it builds successfully, please try with the lenny kernel as well.
>
> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
>
> I know the the c100 is really slow. But if it can help as a buildd host
> pleas
Who is not sensible? Did you read the thread about this? I offered to
help with my maschine and said from the beginning that is is only a
C100. Peter and Lucas told me to build a chroot and try some builds
because I think they were considering my offer. Now when I present the
results, you tell me t
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Christoph Martin wrote:
> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
[snip]
> What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd host?
How about being a little bit sensible? a C100 will *never* be suitable
as a buildd host. Your offer is certainly gene
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
>
> If it builds successfully, please try with the lenny kernel as well.
The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
I know the the c100 is really slow. But if it can help as a buildd host
please let me know.
What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
> >>
> >>> Matt Taggart wrote:
> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa k
dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>>
>>> Matt Taggart wrote:
The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't
see
much point in keeping the archive
Martin Zobel-Helas schrieb am Dienstag, dem 16. Dezember 2008:
> On Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 20:57:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, J?rgen Leibner wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi @all,
> > >
> > > I have here an old and also slow HP D360/2 running an up to date D
Hi,
On Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 20:57:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, J?rgen Leibner wrote:
> >
> > Hi @all,
> >
> > I have here an old and also slow HP D360/2 running an up to date Debian
> > 5.0 (unstable/testing) with running the debian kernel
> >
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Jürgen Leibner wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 00:07 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members
> > of DSA and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was
> > doing. First c
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>
> > Matt Taggart wrote:
> > > The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't
> > > see
> > > much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody
Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
> Matt Taggart wrote:
> > The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't see
> > much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody is working on fixing
> > the kernel (not currently and I suspect not in the futu
On 15/12/08 at 15:45 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> After that I have to kill -9 a miniruby process. Is this a ruby on hppa
> problem or a problem with my box?
an hppa kernel problem.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
Christoph Martin schrieb:
>
> Martin, Christoph schrieb:
>> Peter Palfrader schrieb:
>>> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
>>>
I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
could help as an autobuilder.
>>> Is it able to boot recent ker
Matt Taggart wrote:
> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't see
> much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody is working on fixing
> the kernel (not currently and I suspect not in the future either). This has
> been stated on the debian-hppa list seve
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Matt Taggart wrote:
> A c100 is _really_ slow and probably wouldn't be able to keep up as a
> buildd.
I've already offered countless times (it's in the m-l archive) to
provide buildd power from the ESIEE cluster (see
http://www.fr.parisc-linux.org/cluster.html),
On Sunday 14 December 2008 00:07 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members
> of DSA and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was
> doing. First concerns about this architecture were raised at least
> half a year ago, and
> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
> could help as an autobuilder.
>
> What do you think?
A c100 is _really_ slow and probably wouldn't be able to keep up as a
buildd.
It _might_ have more luck in building some things because of the difference
in processo
On 14/12/08 at 21:25 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>
> Martin, Christoph schrieb:
> > Peter Palfrader schrieb:
> >> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
> >>
> >>> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
> >>> could help as an autobuilder.
Martin, Christoph schrieb:
> Peter Palfrader schrieb:
>> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
>>
>>> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
>>> could help as an autobuilder.
>> Is it able to boot recent kernels successfully?
>
> It runs w
Peter Palfrader schrieb:
> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
>
>> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
>> could help as an autobuilder.
>
> Is it able to boot recent kernels successfully?
It runs with 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-parisc
> Can
Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
> could help as an autobuilder.
Is it able to boot recent kernels successfully? Can it build ruby1.9
successfully, without dying, in an up-to-date sid chroot? Ca
36 matches
Mail list logo
