Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-11 Thread Adam Conrad
ftp-master has downgraded delo's priority, and I have removed it from Packages-arch-specific. That should make all parties happy. Enjoy. ... Adam

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-10 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Schulze wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]: > > > I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that > > > is the general consent. > > > > If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters > > (an

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Andreas Barth wrote: > * Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]: > > I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that > > is the general consent. > > If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters > (and I guess, an upload is not required

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-10 Thread Andreas Barth
* Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]: > I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that > is the general consent. If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters (and I guess, an upload is not required). The bad news is that AFAICS t

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 07:26:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:21:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> > >> >Quite the contrary. delo is intentionally Architecture: any, because >> >it can be used to make CD images bootable for DECstations. In fac

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-09 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Karsten Merker wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:21:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > I just did another test installation on mips and noticed that DELO (a > > > boot loader for some mipsel machines) got installed. > > > > That's strange, as it should be optio

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-09 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:21:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > >Quite the contrary. delo is intentionally Architecture: any, because > >it can be used to make CD images bootable for DECstations. In fact, > >a delo backport is used to create the sarge mipsel CD images.

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:21:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > >Quite the contrary. delo is intentionally Architecture: any, because >it can be used to make CD images bootable for DECstations. In fact, >a delo backport is used to create the sarge mipsel CD images. It used to be, but not any more

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > - get delo removed from Packages-arch-specific so it's actually built >on all arches. This has been requested some weeks ago already. Once this is done, it'll be compiled for other architectures as well, superceding the mips binary so that it doesn't need to be remo

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 11:59:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I just did another test installation on mips and noticed that DELO (a > boot loader for some mipsel machines) got installed. I think that the > mips binary should be removed from testing: > 11559:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] madison del

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-09 01:21]: > > boot loader for some mipsel machines) got installed. > > That's strange, as it should be optional, and nothing depends on it. It should be optional but it is "important". > > I think that the mips binary should be removed from testing:

Re: DELO and sarge

2004-11-08 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I just did another test installation on mips and noticed that DELO (a > boot loader for some mipsel machines) got installed. That's strange, as it should be optional, and nothing depends on it. > I think that the mips binary should be removed from testing: Quite the con