Re: Bug#533091: archive.gpg in amd64 netboot.tar.gz for etch

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Luk, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote: >> If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to >> either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise. > > Yeah, binNMU ought to work fine. Please go ahead with that. b

Re: Bug#533091: archive.gpg in amd64 netboot.tar.gz for etch

Hello Luk, On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to > either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise. Yeah, binNMU ought to work fine. Please go ahead with that. -- Otavio Salvador

Re: Bug#533091: archive.gpg in amd64 netboot.tar.gz for etch

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Pascal, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal > Vandeputte wrote: > [...] >> # ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg >> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42 >> initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg >> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdpu

Re: Bug#533091: archive.gpg in amd64 netboot.tar.gz for etch

Hello Pascal, On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal Vandeputte wrote: [...] > # ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg > -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42 > initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg > -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 5801 2009-06-16 10:42 >