Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:59:51PM +0100, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Michal Politowski <[EMAIL
>>> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:59:51PM +0100, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Michal Politowski <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> >> aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.3),
> >> which is only avai
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Michal Politowski <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>> aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.3),
>> which is only available in experimental.
>
> Ow. So, release team, is the correct way of handling this without
> ma
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.3),
> which is only available in experimental.
Ow. So, release team, is the correct way of handling this without
making everyone even more angry at m
4 matches
Mail list logo
