On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:23:13AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
> > directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
> > problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
> T
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
> directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
> problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
Then please clarify this in t
2 matches
Mail list logo
