Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Matthew Vernon (2024-08-07): > On 07/08/2024 06:18, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Please don't do that until you have approval from d-i. I included > > them in the mail chain. If the udeb is used by d-i, that needs to be > > resolved first. > > Noted, although I'm pretty sure d-i moved to pcre2 a while

Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-07 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, On 07/08/2024 06:18, Paul Gevers wrote: On 06-08-2024 23:33, Bastian Germann wrote: I am including a patch to drop the libpcre3-udeb. Please consider applying so that the package can be autoremoved. Please don't do that until you have approval from d-i. I included them in the mail chain.

Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 06-08-2024 23:33, Bastian Germann wrote: I am including a patch to drop the libpcre3-udeb. Please consider applying so that the package can be autoremoved. Please don't do that until you have approval from d-i. I included them in the mail chain. If the udeb is used by d-i, that needs t

Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-06 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 patch I am including a patch to drop the libpcre3-udeb. Please consider applying so that the package can be autoremoved.diff -Nru pcre3-8.39/debian/changelog pcre3-8.39/debian/changelog --- pcre3-8.39/debian/changelog 2022-12-22 16:45:21.0 + +++ pcre3-8.39/debian/chan

Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-06 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Bastian Germann [240806 22:12]: > Control: tags -1 d-i > > Am 06.08.24 um 20:14 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler: > > libpcre3-udeb is indeed considered Priority: important and thus key. > > > > I'm sure release team will be happy to assist with the removal once > > cfengine3 has migrated. > > Than

Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-06 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 d-i Am 06.08.24 um 20:14 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler: libpcre3-udeb is indeed considered Priority: important and thus key. I'm sure release team will be happy to assist with the removal once cfengine3 has migrated. Thanks for the hint. Is there any reverse dependency in the in

Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

2024-08-06 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 09:20:22AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > On 06/08/2024 09:11, Bastian Germann wrote: > > pcre3 is still showing up with "reason: priority" as key package in > > https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi > > > > So this bug's severity will not take effect to auto