On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:17 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 06:48:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 14:52 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > * Tcl/Tk 8.4/8.5
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 06:48:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 14:52 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > * Tcl/Tk 8.4/8.5
> > > Tcl 8.3 will be replaced by newer versions. This transition is
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 14:52 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > * Tcl/Tk 8.4/8.5
> > Tcl 8.3 will be replaced by newer versions. This transition is
> > currently staged in experimental.
>
> Note that this will impl
Carlo Stemberger wrote:
>> #566335 originally exists because of broken ALSA (alsaconf) settings of
>> individual systems. The problem isn't present in generic installations,
>> AFAIK.
>
> Mmmm, I'm not sure: it's not difficult to find this bug reported, on the
> web, and not only for Debian.
OK,
Roland Stigge ha scritto:
#566335 originally exists because of broken ALSA (alsaconf) settings of
individual systems. The problem isn't present in generic installations,
AFAIK.
Mmmm, I'm not sure: it's not difficult to find this bug reported, on the
web, and not only for Debian.
Regards
Hi,
thanks for your mail!
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> * Removal of OSS
> Only three bugs remain to be resolved to get this release goal
> achieved.
>
> See
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-rele...@lists.debian.org;tag=oss-removal
> for details.
"My" package gtic
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> * Tcl/Tk 8.4/8.5
> Tcl 8.3 will be replaced by newer versions. This transition is
> currently staged in experimental.
Note that this will imply soon a good bounce of NMUs for experimental.
If your packages depends direc
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:57 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> * Full IPv6 support
> Sadly it looks like this goal won't be achieved in time; there are
> currently over 100 bugs open, and many applications still lack proper
> IPv6 support. But it looks far better than with previous releases.
>
8 matches
Mail list logo