Hello,
Interesting matter ! Multiarch :-)
I have experienced the same treatment from binutils maintainer, he did
not answer to my mails or bug reports (393841,432772). Tired of this
and as it is an upstream matter i sent a patch upstream and it got
accepted. For my surprise, it is very close to 3
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:49:07 +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Before you bring this to the tech ctte and such, don't you need a refusal
>by the maintainer?
Acticaly refusing things is not part of Mr. Troup's operations. He
rather sits on such issues for years until they solve thems
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
> > we released lenny without multiarch.
>
> That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sitting
> on way too many packages, stopping progres
> Why did I guess the name of binutils' maintainer correctly _before_
> looking into the PTS?
You're not alone.
> I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
> we released lenny without multiarch.
That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sitting
Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> >> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
> >>include files in the multiarch locations.
> >> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.o
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080416 09:19]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Binutils are frozen for Lenny, so please no additional changes.
> I hope you do agree that binutils will need a freeze exception for
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4762
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>>include files in the multiarch locations.
>> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
>>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:24:09 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The way I understand it, they HAVE been pushing... and pushing... for
>> a long time... against a nonresponsive binutils maintainer. This
>> thread is just their latest, la
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Barth skrev:
>> * Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
>>> I suspect by the time a fully working multiarch is done, x86 won't need
>>> it anymore because everything will be fully 64bit. :)
>
> As Wine maintainer, I'd disagree with th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> > Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>> >include files in the multiarch locations.
>>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>>include files in the multiarch locations.
>> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
>>
Andreas Barth skrev:
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
I suspect by the time a fully working multiarch is done, x86 won't need
it anymore because everything will be fully 64bit. :)
As Wine maintainer, I'd disagree with that.
People, we want to release soon. Anyone is wel
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> > > Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
> > >include files in the multiarch l
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> > Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
> >include files in the multiarch locations.
> > Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to suggest a new release goal
The release goal list is frozen. We will only drop goals, not add new
ones.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
287: Palestinänsertipper
1 Anschlag pro Minute. (Bodo Eggert)
p
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>>include files in the multiarch locations.
>> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
>>
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>include files in the multiarch locations.
> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
> State: All done except for binutils. Patch exists
Hi,
I would like to suggest a new release goal and hope that some DDs will
advocate it. This one is actualy quite trivial but some convincing
seems to be neccessary to get it done:
# Multiarch capable toolchain
Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
include files
18 matches
Mail list logo
